Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sat Apr 22 17:44:38 2006
References: <6E88B99E-D575-4827-8F14-4DCD32C8161A@interlink.es> <000101c6661e$dc616420$656c0e44@newukolbqveo9i>

Jeffery,
I wouldn't worry about your Mamiya.  Shoot what seems to make sense with
that format.  Mechanical cameras can be fixed if you want to repair it badly
enough.  Usually there is one or two weak links that can be repaired or
replaced.  With mechanical, the cost of a forging a new gear or shaft is
only going to be three figures.  Electronic devices are a completely
different matter.  Theoretically, you could create a CPU that could be
programmed to mimic any circuit board but the cost in mental power and in
reverse engineering would be prohibitive.  So we get to a throw away cycle,
toss the old and in with the new.

Currently, that works because the new is generally more capable so there is
no loss.  But, I would tell you that the look of a 6X7 chrome shot with a
Mamiya 7 and the 43mm would be very hard to reproduce by any digital
currently.  Possibly the new 39 MP back on the new Hassy and a 30 something
mm lens.  The Xpan is another unique camera that even stitching is hard
pressed to mimic.

In the end, these are tools that either help or hinder what we collectively
want to create.  Sometimes digital works, sometimes film works, and
sometimes it is F8 and be there.

Personnaly, I think that film will have a creative revival as more people
quit film and go digital.  When something is new looking but reminds you of
something you like, then it is going to be reused.  Think of the fashion
world reinterpreting things every decade or so.

Go out, and keep pushing the shutter button, cable release, electronic
dohickey, matchbox pinhole cover, or hat over the lens.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 4/22/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>
> I had just picked up a Mamiya 7 lens from KEH last week. For some reason,
> I
> felt that Mamiya would always be *there* in the MF format. I swallowed
> hard
> when I read yesterday's announcement. My first impulse? Burn tons of film
> while there are still parts available.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Luis
> Miguel Casta?eda
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 5:09 AM
> To: lug@leica-users.org
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya
>
>
>
> On 22/04/2006, at 4:58, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:
>
> > And I was temtped to start saving for that camera!
>
> Do it, what's the problem?
>
> Nobody is fearing to buy out of production cars, or other bargain
> items if they fall into the right price just because they're
> discontinued or the original manufacturer was sold. Nobody here has
> cameras with a lot of road on in their last 50 years?
>
> :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya now camera repairs)
Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya)
In reply to: Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya)
Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re:Bye Bye Mamiya)