Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry...didn't finish...What I was trying to say is that I find it fascinating that the same people who have no problem calling a Roman Catholic Bishop a bigot, or intolerant for adhering to the beliefs of his church would no more think of calling bigoted or intolerant Muslim cleric who insist that women wear traditional head dress, or Orthodox Jews who insist that women dress a certain way. On 4/14/06 7:35 PM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote: > That's hardly "bigoted." what don't people get abt the fact that the Roman > Catholic Church is an extremely conservative, hierarchical, male dominated, > non-democratic institution whose leader is believed to be God's > representative on earth? It's not a cafeteria plan religion; it's the > Pope's way or the highway.Period. I find it fascinating that people would > call a Bishop who adhears to tradition 'intolerant,' but wouldn't think of > cbigot > ___ > Sent with SnapperMail > www.snappermail.com > > ...... Original Message ....... > On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:35:12 -0500 "Arche, Harvey" <Harvey.Arche@jp2hs.org> > wrote: > "I think Barney's issue is with a Bishop who says that a priest carrying > out the foot washing ritual can only perform it on men, and women can't > have their feet washed. Unless I missed something. > "Arche > " > "B.D. wrote: > "Good Lord, Barney - the man's a "bigot" or "intolerant" because he doesn't > "believe that according to scripture women should wash feet? How do you > "figure that? > " > " > "_______________________________________________ > "Leica Users Group. > "See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information