[Leica] why we photograph?

[kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)]

On Apr 3, 2006, at 4:21 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> Enough of "what's your favorite color film?" or "which exotic  
> animal skin
> makes the best covering for a gold plated IIIg?" Today's question is a
> three parter:
> A. Why do you photograph?
> B. What's your primary subject matter?
> C. Why?


a wonderful topic BD...thanks.   I will give this some thought.

Steve
>
>
>
> ___
> Sent with SnapperMail
> www.snappermail.com
>
> ...... Original Message .......
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:09:24 +0100 "John Beeching"  
> <johnbeeching@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> "Dear Don,
> "
> "Thanks for you comments, they are very useful.  This particular set
> "were all taken at the same place, though as you point out, there is
> "some disparity of content.  The contrast/darkness/lightness is
> "something I must look at - I have just bought a new monitor (NEC
> "Spectraview 1980) and it is quite different from my aged CRT.
> "
> "John
> "
> "On 02/04/06, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote:
> "> John,
> "> The gallery you pointed us to is for the most part very austere,  
> almost
> no
> "> people with just some signs of habitation such as graffitti on  
> one wall
> or
> "> some laundry hanging up.  They work together with the exception  
> of the
> "> woodland shots that just don't have any snap visually or  
> contrast and the
> "> image of the two people on the edge of the beach.
> ">
> "> The two on the beach is a good engimatic image, but doesn't work  
> in that
> "> group.
> ">
> "> I would say that for the web most of the images could use just a  
> touch
> more
> "> contrast; they lack an absolute black and seem to stop just  
> short of
> white.
> "> The roof top scenes in particular would benefit from a very small
> increase
> "> in contrast as shown on a monitor.
> ">
> "> I took a quick peek at some of you other galleries and you have  
> some
> mighty
> "> fine images throughout.
> ">
> "> Thanks for showing us your work.
> ">
> "> Don
> "> don.dory@gmail.com
> ">
> ">
> "> On 4/2/06, John Beeching <johnbeeching@gmail.com> wrote:
> "> >
> "> > Dear All,
> "> >
> "> > http://staff.bath.ac.uk/bssjrb/Photographic/conil/conil.htm
> "> >
> "> > Tri-X DDX 1+4, 28, 35 & 50mm.
> "> >
> "> > Comments and criticisms welcome.
> "> >
> "> > John
> "> >
> "> > --
> "> > John Beeching
> "> > http://staff.bath.ac.uk/bssjrb/Photographic/photo.htm
> "> >
> "> >
> "> > _______________________________________________
> "> > Leica Users Group.
> "> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
> information
> "> >
> ">
> "> _______________________________________________
> "> Leica Users Group.
> "> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
> information
> ">
> "
> "
> "--
> "John Beeching
> "http://staff.bath.ac.uk/bssjrb/Photographic/photo.htm
> "
> "
> "_______________________________________________
> "Leica Users Group.
> "See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information