Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XLVII Single cherry blossom
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Thu Mar 30 18:37:03 2006
References: <9b678e0603301541r4e017cbob317f8d3d7eb8cc5@mail.gmail.com> <442C6F8E.80206@waltjohnson.com> <6631-SnapperMsg4EA12C31C052227F@70.194.234.177> <9b678e0603301815n3ff5fec1m46c18877cfd936a1@mail.gmail.com> <442C9417.3040108@waltjohnson.com>

Walt,
I'm not going to rise to that one.  :)  I can say that one of my friends has
done very well repping Mapplethorpe at her Gallery, very well indeed.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 3/30/06, Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
>
> Well, the shadow thing sure elicited a good response, perhaps we should
> seek controversy? Don't know if you noticed, but I like controversy. :-)
>
> I like flowers too, Also like trees. Have been doing a lot of back your
> fixer uping lately and by late spring it might be a good photo location.
>
> Walt
>
> btw Mapplethorpe's work, to me, was bland as hell. Hate to sound like BD
> and get prejudicial but had Mapplethorpe been straight and photoed T*Ts
> instead of D**ks we'd have never heard the name.
>
> Don Dory wrote:
>
> >No, the one thing about flower photography is that it is pretty
> >non-controversial.  Even Mapplethorpe didn't have any bullwhips with his
> >flowers.  But I think after the CIA shot I am going to concsiously look
> for
> >something fairly controversial for a PAW.  It has been fascinating how
> >people interprete the image.
> >
> >Don
> >don.dory@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >On 3/30/06, B. D. Colen <bdcolen@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>No ruffled feathers here - not enough left to ruffle. :-)
> >>___
> >>Sent with SnapperMail
> >>www.snappermail.com
> >>
> >>...... Original Message .......
> >>On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:53:50 -0500 Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>"Now that is vivid....and striking
> >>"
> >>"walt
> >>"
> >>"p.s. hope no one got their "feathers ruffled", ok BD?
> >>"
> >>"Don Dory wrote:
> >>"
> >>">This one is on Velvia 100, but the blossom was this vivid red.
> >>">
> >>">http://gallery.leica-users.org/album362/cherrysingleton
> >>">
> >>">Don
> >>">don.dory@gmail.com
> >>">
> >>">_______________________________________________
> >>">Leica Users Group.
> >>">See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>">
> >>">
> >>">
> >>">
> >>"
> >>"
> >>"_______________________________________________
> >>"Leica Users Group.
> >>"See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Leica Users Group.
> >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XLVII Single cherry blossom)
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XLVII Single cherry blossom)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XLVII Single cherry blossom)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XLVII Single cherry blossom)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Daily Dose of Spring XLVII Single cherry blossom)