Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Feli, if you cannot go for the 4800, then work on the 2400 as your option. Make your own computation ............ I did mine based on a number of basic facts from Epson .................... break even on A3 prints at 1440 was at 225-230 prints per month ................ do you own calculation, its safer! For me, the A3 print was ? $5.50 including depreciation over 36 months, ink, paper. Go get your abacus .............. B. On 30-mrt-2006, at 22:21, feli wrote: > >> Feli - I have the 2400's big brother, the 4800. The inks and >> everything are the same, the 4800 will just print larger sizes. It >> does a beautiful job on glossy paper. I don't think you would regret >> at all buying one. Keep in mind though, though, that the printer is >> cheap compared to the inks and papers! There are sites on the >> internet that will give you an approximate cost per print for the >> 2400. >> >> Have fun! >> >> Tina >> > > Thanks Tina. It looks like the decision to buy the Epson isn't > simple either. > I seem to remember a post a while back (it may have been from you) > that > showed that past 300 prints the 4800 actually is the better deal, > because > of the cost of ink. On the other hand I can't just plunk down the > money for a > 4800. > > It's never simple, is it? > ;-) > > feli > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------------- > Feli di Giorgio feli2@earthlink.net > www.elanphotos.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information