Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Actual Leica discussion
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Fri Mar 24 10:30:07 2006
References: <26136392.1143223303333.JavaMail.root@elwamui-hybrid.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Lager II also shows a TLCOO 400/f5 on a 1000F (p.121) and a HIKOO 125/2.5 on
a 2000FC on p. 95.

-rei


On Mar24 10:01, Douglas Herr wrote:
> > ... OTOH, if the lens were advertised to cover a smaller format, but not
> > advertised to cover a larger format, even though it did indeed cover that
> > larger format, would be a winner.....a real winner....at a price point.
> 
> Not particularly germane to the digital RF lens topic, but the old 280mm 
> f/4.8 Telyt is one such lens.  It will cover 6x6, no problem.  I've seen 
> it adapted to Mamiya 645 and Pentax 6x7 mounts.
> 
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Actual Leica discussion)
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Actual Leica discussion)