Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So long Rodinal. I'm going to miss you.
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Fri Mar 17 08:19:52 2006
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B366BAADC@case-email>

You obviously need another Leica body, Dave.

Douglas Herr has an R8 for an interesting price .................  
check it out????

B.

On 17-mrt-2006, at 17:07, David Rodgers wrote:

> I had a couple rolls of 135 Tech Pan that I never shot, simply  
> because I
> knew I'd struggle with it. It always seems to work out that when I  
> have
> slow film in my Leica I find myself needing to shoot indoors in low
> light. If I load fast film I'm outdoors with f16 my only option. TC400
> BW is a great film for scanning, and it has a lot of latitude. But I
> can't process C-41, and I like to process my own film.
>
> I hate to admit it -- because it has a bad rap -- but my favorite film
> is TMAX 400. It impressed me the first time I tried it, which was back
> when it first came out. Even rated at 800 it had amazingly fine grain,
> even in Rodinal. I normally use very diltute Rodinal or XTOL.
>
> TMY does have some quirks, though. Properly developed, the negs almost
> look underdeveloped, or way too thin. That takes some getting used to.
> Especially when I eye the negs next to other films.
>
> BTW, speaking of Tech Pan, several of my all time favorite bw  
> prints --
> which I still have on my walls -- were captured years ago on 120 Tech
> Pan in  a Pentax 645. Makes me wonder why I ever sold the Pentax. I
> guess I wanted the status of owning a Hasselblad :-) !
>
> DaveR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffery Smith [mailto:jsmith342@cox.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:36 PM
> To: 'Leica Users Group'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] So long Rodinal. I'm going to miss you.
>
> After several days of shooting Rollei 25, I am wondering how I used to
> manage with Kodachrome 25 handheld.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> David
> Rodgers
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:16 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: RE: [Leica] So long Rodinal. I'm going to miss you.
>
>
> Jeffery,
>
> I wonder if it's the 100 ASA that a lot of people aren't warming up  
> to.
> I
> don't see a lot of difference between modern 100 and 400 ASA BW films,
> especially in a digital workflow. I've used Acros and it's a nice  
> film.
> I'm
> tempted to try it, and even slower films, now and then. But I
> usually end using something faster.
>
> DaveR
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffery Smith [mailto:jsmith342@cox.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 8:21 PM
> To: 'Leica Users Group'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] So long Rodinal. I'm going to miss you.
>
> I'm getting very nice results with Fuji Acros. For some reason, nobody
> else
> seems to be warming up to that film.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] So long Rodinal. I'm going to miss you.)