Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That's the lens that has a rear element that protrudes like Marty Feldman's eyeball into the back of the camera. Unfortunately, it hits the back of the Bessas. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jayanand Govindaraj Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 7:59 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM Daniel, That lens seems to be a bargain. Is there a reliable source to buy them from, or is it a lottery? Cheers Jayanand Daniel Ridings wrote: >On 3/12/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote: > > > >>Right now, I'm pursuing the 35/2.8, which is more of a challenge than >>the 35/3.5. >> >> >> > >You want the classic b/w cream of the crop 35/2.8? > >$60 will get you a Jupiter-12. I seriously doubt that the Summaron >35/2.8 would be as good, and at any rate it would absolutely not be >better. > >http://gallery.leica-users.org/album08/05v35_0019 >http://gallery.leica-users.org/album08/05v35_0024 (very close to >wide-open) > >Daniel > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information