Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sun Mar 12 08:47:00 2006
References: <581354E8-F781-4ACB-A7C8-CD171948D535@charter.net> <000101c645e6$b3fe7430$656c0e44@newukolbqveo9i> <ceb1a5650603120742o19c4b701x9d0f3c5c019066cc@mail.gmail.com>

I once had a Canon LTM 35mm F1.8. But I wasn't happy with it either.  
I paired with it with a Nikkor 50mm, which was somewhat acceptable.  
All were used on a Canon L1. After I got a hold of a M3 bugeyed  
'cron, the Canon was history.

Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8,
Angels Gate Cultural Center
http://sdimitrovphoto.com





On Mar 12, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Mark Langer wrote:

> Had the 35/3.5 and wasn't that impressed with it.  I now use a  
> 35/3.5 Elmar,
> which is incredibly tiny and acceptable in quality, a 35/2.8  
> Summaron, which
> is better, and a 35/2 Canon, which blows them all away, but absolutely
> requires a lenshood.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 3/12/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> The consensus from the people who have it and those who have  
>> reviewed it
>> is
>> that the 35/3.5 is good as long as it is stopped down  
>> considerably. I'm
>> not
>> crazy about that restraint, so I'll go after big brother 2.8.
>>
>> Jeffery Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>> http://www.400tx.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>> Slobodan
>> Dimitrov
>> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 8:53 AM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM
>>
>>
>> Now the f2.8 Summaron is another animal. While not as small as it
>> F3.5 counterpart, it certainly dovetails quite well, with its
>> signature, alongside the current lenses.
>>
>> Slobodan Dimitrov
>> Studio G-8,
>> Angels Gate Cultural Center
>> http://sdimitrovphoto.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2006, at 6:40 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Well, that's the kind of character I'm looking for. When lenses were
>>> designed for B&W film, I guess there wasn't much tweaking for
>>> color. With
>>> color as the way to go later in the century, saturation was the way
>>> to go.
>>> And with that came contrast (which I can do without). Although I'm
>>> not a
>>> praticer of the Zone System, I would like to see all of those zones
>>> represented in an image.
>>>
>>> Right now, I'm pursuing the 35/2.8, which is more of a challenge
>>> than the
>>> 35/3.5.
>>>
>>> Jeffery Smith
>>> New Orleans, LA
>>> http://www.400tx.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Peter
>>> Dzwig
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:24 AM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM
>>>
>>>
>>> Very happy with it. Good performance for its time, still a very
>>> good lens,
>>> although obviously very different from present lenses in character.
>>>
>>> see:
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/album164/pathSt_Marthas200512
>>>
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/album347/Blowingoutcandles
>>>
>>> Peter Dzwig
>>>
>>> Jeffery Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the consensus on this as a shooter?
>>>>
>>>> Jeffery Smith
>>>> New Orleans, LA
>>>> http://www.400tx.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] 35/3.5 Summaron LTM)