Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. showed and asked: >>> Here's the real decision - all these were shot with the E330, using >>> "live > view" and the LCD, with the 14-54 f2.8/3.5 Olympus "pro" lens - in-camera > black and white; no post-shoot sharpening, noise reduction, etc., just > some > levels/curves adjustment.<<< B. D., You see what you do with this kind of presentation is...Make me ask, "Why is it necessary for some folks to buy all that extra software, Pinki pix, softy hearts and heads" or whatever all those weird names to supposedly make digital look better that are not necessary when shooting film? Now obviously digital! My gut feeling when looking at the pores and skin texture in these digital images, even though on screen, are the closest looking wet tray "prints" from Leica lenses I've seen, heck even from my own on the 20D with a Leica lens. Or looking at dry film prints from previous shootings. They're quite surprisingly good, actually they are better than good! Just looking at the image quality I'm damn near ready to change equipment, almost. ;-) They really look like film images without question, very interesting to say the least. Finally a digital camera that makes the humans look like real pictures. Not that I'm not pleased with my own digital photography from the digilux 2 and the 20D, I am very much so. But your photographs would leave one hard pressed not think these were well made B&W film photographs. ted