Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Jupiter-12 can look "huge" if you see a picture of it in isolation but on the camera, most of its "bulk" is inside the camera body, not protruding outside. It extends less than 3cm from the body (2.54 cm = 1 inch). It is probably comparable to the CV 35/2.5, give or take. Daniel On 3/2/06, Arche, Harvey <Harvey.Arche@jp2hs.org> wrote: > Greg, didn't you get one of these a while back? > I'm looking to replace my LTM Summaron that has etched glass. Either I'll > get another Summaron, the CV 35/2.5 classic, or try the biogon knock-off. > The big plus with the 3.5 summaron is the low profile (especially on a > Barnack), but the haze/etch factor makes shopping at the auction site > chancy. > I'm thinking the CV 35 classic will be sharper but more contrasty, but I > prefer the older flatter look, thinking its better to have more range of > grey to start with than less (after all, what is PhotoShop for but to > tweak curves?). > The Jupiter 12 may have the look I want, but it appears to be huge where I > want inconspicuous. > All input valued, and if you've got a clean 3.5 Summaron you'd like to > sell reach me off-list. > H. Arche > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >