Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like Bill's thinking. I really think the difference in the facial area is worth losing the arch. I'd play with the cropping to see if I could give it a little more "art." I like them both. Ric Carter http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies On Mar 1, 2006, at 8:27 PM, bill harting wrote: > I prefer the second, with the tender touch. Some cropping may be > indicated. > > Bill H > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luis Ripoll" > <luisripoll@telefonica.net> > To: "Users Group Leica" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:45 PM > Subject: [Leica] Which one you prefer? > > >> Hi all, >> >> I've posted 2 pictures, and I'm not really decided which one I >> prefer. I'll >> appreciate your comments, thanks for looking! >> >> Both with Leica MP, Elmar M 2,8/50 mm (the latest), TMX 400 >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4176099 >> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4176094 >> >> >> Saludos desde Barcelona, >> Luis >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information