Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Richard, I'd second Peter K's suggestion. Taking a step back and giving it a few days will surely tell you which you prefer - and at the end of the day it will be your call, your expression of the image and your photo, whatever the rest of the LUG says ;-) Peter Dzwig Peter Klein wrote: > Left off the subject the first time, let's try this again. . . > > At 10:15 PM 2/26/2006 -0800, Richard wrote: > >I guess these pics from San Francisco look pretty neat too: > >http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/LJPics/022506/crop0015.jpg > >> Someone said this picture could use more contrast, so here it is: >> http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/LJPics/022506/crop0015_modded.jpg > > > Richard: I like this picture. While I know what it really is, it makes > me think of the Huygens probe's aerial views of Titan from below the > cloud layer. > > Not sure which version I like better. The first has a nice long scale. > The second is "punchier," but loses a little detail. People could > argue about it forever. I'd make two prints, put them aside for a > couple of days, then look at them fresh. If you still can't decide, > make one with contrast in between the two. > > --Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >