Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Dusty Negative Scan Revised, Tina M. and Douglas S.
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Sun Feb 26 22:29:32 2006
References: <379189b3792f82.3792f82379189b@shaw.ca>

Greg,
This message usually comes up when the input is file more than 8-bit, 
are you losing too much by converting down?
Though I don't quite understand why it should work once and then stop, 
my version refused to do 16-bit right from the start..
cheers
Douglas

GREG LORENZO wrote:

>I took a break from scan cleanup and spent some time in the darkroom this 
>afternoon.
>
>Since then I downloaded both the recommended DCE Tools (Hot Pixels) and 
>Polaroid's Dust and Scratch repair software. The DCE Tools software worked 
>great once with my Tiff file of this image, which was scanned and remained 
>a RGB 16 bit file. After the first DCE cleaning it would open a window 
>saying it only worked with "RGB files". The Tiff was still in fact RGB. 
>Other than not working beyond the first time it worked really well using 
>the default settings. Any ideas what I could be doing wrong to get this 
>message? 
>
>With the Polaroid software, the apparent correction using the default 
>settings was not as great, but the SW worked everytime.
>
>The Polaroid adjusted image is posted here:
>
>http://www.leica-gallery.net/gjl-1/image-92010.html
>
>Original negative was Kodak Tri-X (not Fuji Acros). This neg was from the 
>Tri-X formulation prior to the current formula. Kodak was right, the older 
>Tri-X has more silver in it and does not scan as well.
>
>Thanks again Tina and Douglas!
>
>Regards,
>
>Greg
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Dusty Negative Scan Revised, Tina M. and Douglas S.)