Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have 15, 25, 35 (f2.5), 50 (f1.5) and 90, and they're all pretty decent indeed. Nick --- Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Rob, > 12, 15, 25, 50 and 75 are all brilliant, although > the 12mm is rather > limited in its applications (it is great for > panoramas cropped out of > full frames) > cheers > Douglas > > Rob Pritchett wrote: > > > Good day, and a very happy Saturday to all... > > > > Having 'liquidated' my Lecia collection some years > ago (to fund my > > childrens' trip through private high school), I am > left with only my > > trusty M2 and a couple of lenses... 50mm 2.8 Elmar > (old version) and > > the obligatory 35mm Summicron. > > > > Having been very fond of my 21mm 2.8 Super > Angular, I am interested > > in diving back into the 'super wide' arena but > simply cannot justify > > the outlay for a replacement for my > now-on-somebody-else's-camera SA. > > I have been thinking of the VC 21mm, as it seems > to be an acceptable > > substitute. > > > > So, I was wondering if any (or many) on this list > were regular VC > > users - 21mm or otherwise - and what your words of > wisdom might be in > > the regards these lenses. > > > > Thank you very much for your time and kind > consideration. > > > > Rob Pritchett > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug > for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for > more information > ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Photos ? NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com