Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Tina's issues with colors
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Wed Feb 22 16:44:51 2006
References: <43FC8DE2.1050702@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0602221638i1c094877x78b305c04dff134b@mail.gmail.com>

Don,

Very useful, I've forwarded this email to my buddy.

Thanks!

Scott

Don Dory wrote:

>Scott,
>Interesting that you should ask this question.  DIMA, an industry trade
>group, has been running a test for the past several PMA's.  Basically, they
>let studio's digitally record a piece of art and then try to duplicate the
>image through a digital work flow.  As of last March the differences between
>the art and the reproduction was essentially zero.  If you looked very
>carefully, specific shades were different than in the original.  When I
>asked one of the participants, he explained that an artist could mix a color
>with oil or acrylic paints that was so far out of the color space available
>using any print materials available that there would continue to be specific
>colors that did not register.
>
>He continued that the trick was to keep the rest of the art piece color
>accurate and then find a color that was in the same Pantone family that it
>did not call attention to the difference either with the specific color or
>with the harmony of the art work.
>
>So, essentially, the state of digital capture and reproduction is good
>enough that original art works can essentially be duplicated in appearance.
>You can bet that museums and artists find this especially interesting.
>Think of it as selling lithographs with an unlimited production run so that
>while carefully labeled as a copy, would still generate income for the
>museum and the artist.
>
>Don
>don.dory@gmail.com
>
>
>On 2/22/06, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I also thought that, whatever the issues, Tina's final images
>>looked lovely (at least on my monitor).
>>
>>But it made me wonder. Is a DSLR suitable for tasks such as
>>reproducing paintings for catalogs and the like? I know that
>>color fidelity is an issue for neg and chromes too, but does
>>digital have any particular or special weaknesses in this area?
>>
>>I have a buddy who does some commercial work in this area.
>>He shoots only film to date, and says his "top shelf" clients
>>usually request large format chromes.  But he's interested in
>>digi for some of his other clients.
>>
>>Any pointers appreciated.
>>
>>Scott
>>
>>--
>>Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
>>Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
>>(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>  
>

-- 
Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)



In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Tina's issues with colors)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Tina's issues with colors)