Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bogus M2-R Auction
From: gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO)
Date: Mon Feb 20 19:05:41 2006

Seth Rosner writes: 

> Thanks Greg; there is another anomaly in their listings. The camera listed 
> immediately after the faux M2R is a "Leica-M Post Camera" with 35/2,8 
> Summaron lens. The Leica body behind the lens is an M3. I am not Jim 
> Lager, 
> Gianni Rogliatti nor even our own Tom Abrahamssen. But I have seen a lot 
> of 
> Leica post cameras. They have all had solid topplates, no 
> range/viewfinder. 
> I have never seen an M3 "post camera" and am quite certain that such never 
> existed. Why would Leitz waste the money to put an expensive 
> range/viewfinder on a camera that would never use it. Very strange 
> stuff going on in that store.
> 

Hi Seth,

Per Jim Lager: KS-15-4 (aka Military M2-R and M2-S) Serial Number Range 
1163150-1163770 & 1164046-1164300.

Also, not per Jim Lager, but from memory:

Additionally, these US Military cameras were specially sealed, the transport 
axle was different and a hidden wire runs inside the camera along the edge 
of the back door.

The back door in one submitted Ebay image was open. No specially sealant 
beyond what my standard M2 has.

The top plate has the standard M2 (not M2-R) script. A military KS-15-4 has 
no special markings on the top plate but this camera is not an KS-15-4.

I too am troubled by the 'sexed up' Ebay description. Can anyone that has 
served in any military, anywhere, imagine that type of organization 'black 
painting' a camera during war time? 

Regards,

Greg



Replies: Reply from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Bogus M2-R Auction)