Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Mon Feb 20 13:08:30 2006

I looked up the 4800 at B&H. I like the fact that it has a "tank" instead of
a "cartridge". Does this mean you get a lot of prints inked for $39.95?

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina
Manley
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 3:02 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: RE: [Leica] silver vs pixels


At 03:57 PM 2/20/2006, you wrote:
>Is there a good B&W digital printer out there that doesn't cost a 
>fortune and doesn't go belly up after 30 prints?
>
>Jeffery Smith

How does the saying go?  Fast, cheap, or good - choose 2?  The Epson 
4800 costs a fortune but it is referred to as an engine.  There is no 
comparison between the big printing engines and the small 
printers.  My 3000's lasted for years and are still going strong - 
and still for sale, too ;-)  but this isn't Friday.

Tina

Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com 



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)