Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA
From: nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri Feb 10 23:58:05 2006
References: <43E44556.2060001@gmail.com> <B9C6C3CE-2E7E-4685-B6EE-6A1FE1205BC4@pandora.be> <43E55E4F.70301@gmail.com> <15271210.1139106748845.JavaMail.s_gregory1@mac.com> <22c93b290602051052w128f1026n591b9505943269b8@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20060205212353.0313a3e0@screengang.com> <22c93b290602051546r17c62861hcef8b9c78405f709@mail.gmail.com> <003101c62ab0$00423ef0$2ee76c18@ted> <9b678e0602051800o70bb115cmc9784997cc5e28c6@mail.gmail.com>

Don is right on the mark here. I have over the years used both Kodak's 
TMax 3200, Ilford's D3200 and Fuji Neopan 1600. The Neopan/XTOL 
combination gave by far the best results in terms of grain and tonality.

Nathan

Don Dory wrote:

> You know, you could all shoot Neopan 1600 which developed in Xtol at a
> dilution of 1-3 is really a 1600 speed film with normal density curve.
> 32200 is doable as a normal push at about 20% increase of time.  Grain is
> fine and the tonality is still good.
> 
> Just my 2 cents about a really underrated film.
> 
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
> 
> 
> On 2/5/06, Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote:
> 
>>Matt quit while yer a head! ;-)
>>ted
>>Ted Grant Photography Limited
>>1817 Feltham Road
>>Victoria BC  V8N 2A4
>>250-477-2156
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Matt Powell" <wooderson@gmail.com>
>>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:46 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA
>>
>>
>>
>>>On 2/5/06, Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>... neither Delta 3200 nor TMax 3200 is a true 3200-speed film.
>>>>
>>>>Matt
>>>>What do you ecaxtly mean with "not a true 3200-speed film"?  Just
>>>>curious.
>>>>Didier
>>>
>>>However ISO is measured (I believe it's shadow density at
>>>something-or-other blah blah blah, I don't do testing of that kind),
>>>neither of the 3200 films is a 'true' 3200 ISO (as Tri-X is a true 400
>>>in certain developers, etc.). TMZ or Delta3200 at 3200 is underexposed
>>>(and then push-processed).
>>>
>>>This is all badly explained, I'm sure.
>>>
>>>--
>>>MP
>>>wooderson@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com

Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com

Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



Replies: Reply from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
In reply to: Message from evanowski at gmail.com (Edmund Evanowski) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from evanowski at gmail.com (Edmund Evanowski) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)