Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The real noise issue, I suspect, is not noise itself - we all lived with grain, after all. Instead, it is the distribution of noise. That is, where grain was evenly distributed across an image, because, of course, it made up the image, noise is not evenly distributed, and therefore becomes much more apparent than it might otherwise be - and more objectionable. I suspect that as time passes and we become used to the idiosyncrasies of digital, we will be less and less aware of, and bothered by noise and other digital artifacts. Of course I also suspect that with each passing year, if not month, there will be less and less noise and artifacts to see. ;-) B. D. On 2/8/06 5:11 PM, "Didier Ludwig" <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote: > Ted > > Just imagine it the other way, in the good ol' times of film: if there > would > have been a efficient wetlab trick to get the grain completely out of your > available light or whatever grainy shots - would you have used it at least > from time to time? I guess yes. > > http://tinyurl.com/ac0e > Scroll down to the bottom and you see two pictures. Left: unfiltered, > right: > filtered. > > cheers > Didier > > > > >> It would be great if in simple language some one will explain this >> question. >> Considering this is a question from the dimwit level. Please explain how >> some >> of you people have a noise problem and I've only seen it in a few picture >> situations where I suppose I pushed my luck in almost available darkness >> situations and near blew the shot? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information