[Leica] Tina and Digital (was, Enlarger

[bquinn at sgi.com (Bernard Quinn)]

Thanks, I wanted to try to give something back.

Barney

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bquinn=sgi.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bquinn=sgi.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of bruce
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:40 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Tina and Digital (was, Enlarger

I'm lost in this babble .................. but what I do know Barney,  
is that your text on "image processing and computing" is a succinct  
and meaningful analysis of the various aspects which can only serve  
to further the knowledge of most/many of those on the LUG ...........  
a time-consuming account, for which thank you.

B.


On 7-feb-2006, at 20:08, Barney Quinn wrote:

>
>
> I think that Marc should use whatever kind of photographic  
> technology he wants to
> use. It's his art, and his prerogative to make what ever choices  
> will enhance his
> work and allow him to achieve his creative ends. If he doesn't like  
> digital, then
> he shouldn't use it. I'll go a step further and say that I, too, am  
> one of the
> people who wonder about what seems to be a shift from film to  
> digital on this
> list. But, I don't want to get into that. I think that it is fair  
> to say that we
> are a leica-centric on-line community rather than  a strict leica- 
> users group.
> But, that's OK with me. I think that the diversity on this list is  
> its greatest
> strength.
>
> I am not one of the Alpha members of this list. I never will be. I  
> don't even want
> to be. I don't often know enough about anything on this list to be  
> able to comment
> on it intelligently, so I don't. Perhaps I misunderstood. My  
> reading of
> yesterday's thread on this subject is that Marc had asked several  
> times what RIP
> meant. I thought that he was asking because he wanted to know. I  
> can't tell a
> NOOKY from a ROOKEY. But, it just so happens that I do know  
> something about image
> processing and computing. I thought, as a fair exchange for all the  
> information I
> have gained from this list and for which I have never paid a fee or  
> made a
> contribution in return, that I would offer what I could in the way  
> of an
> explanation. If I have wasted the groups time, I am sorry. But, my  
> attempt at an
> explanation didn't come easily, and it was my attempt to give the  
> group what
> benefit I could of my years of experience, just as those who have  
> had years of
> experience in photography have offered theirs.
>
> Barney
>
>
>
> "B. D. Colen" wrote:
>
>> Okay, I wasn't going to post this unless this started up again  
>> today...but
>> since it has....(and all due respect to you, Barney :-) )
>> ...
>> This is perhaps the single most inane thread ever to take up LUG  
>> bandwidth.
>> :-)
>>  Tina is not a techie. I am not a techie. Ted is not a techie, nor  
>> are most
>> of the hundreds of other people on this list who have figured out  
>> - mostly
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information