Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Tue Feb 7 07:56:40 2006
References: <C00BEFE1.3F25%telyt@earthlink.net><00d401c62b68$9875d4d0$91cb9253@Korhonen><6.2.3.4.2.20060206171516.041c9750@mail.rhtc.net> <000701c62b78$e209c9c0$2ee76c18@ted>

That standard has not moved.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?


> Raimo K said:
>
>>>I would have thought that good, powerful photography would be the 
>>>standard to aim for.
>>>And it can be achieved without ISO 1600.<<<<
>
> Raimo,
> let's put it this way.............
>
> First of all it doesn't matter what discipline of photography we are 
> involved in, we all aim for the same standard: >> good, powerful 
> photography <<<
>
> Actually we who earn our living in this profession aim for even higher 
> standards because if we don't deliver better than better everytime, we may 
> never shoot another assignment for the same client.
>
> The clients don't ask what camera, what film, they don't give a diddly 
> squat. All they're interested in is... the best damn powerful pictures 
> from the assignment I can deliver.... without any excuses.  PERIOD!
>
> Oh in the olden days the magazines might like you to shoot Kodachrome if 
> there was time for processing. Or the art director or photo editor might 
> say something about deadline and shoot whatever fast turn around film we 
> could use, but that was about it.
>
> And to keep any client supplied with powerful first class photographs, if 
> that means shooting at whatever the hell ASA it may take, my camera's will 
> be set for the success of the assignment and the satisfaction of the 
> client!
>
> Not the ridiculous out pouring against ASA/DIN/ISO ratings, whatever the 
> hell you want to call it, by list members during the past few days. But as 
> Don Dory offered.... "it's the difference between amateurs and 
> professionals!"  So be it!
>
> Clients who quite frankly pay me quite nicely for my ability in delivering 
> "powerful photography!" No matter what ASA I use are the only people I and 
> the other pros need be concerned with.
>
> And to all LUGGERS who may disagree.... that's your problem, not ours!
>
> People like Tina and myself, as well as others on the list who earn their 
> keep through the wonderful world of photography, we have to deliver with 
> no excuses and reputations to up hold.
>
> Big difference to being a weekend warrior!
>
> ted
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
Message from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)