Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat Feb 4 14:36:21 2006
References: <200602041530.k14FQSAR017508@server1.waverley.reid.org> <43E4D86E.1090208@telefonica.net> <43E4F57A.40506@gmx.de>
 
Douglas Sharp said:

> Interesting that my initials, DMS, next to photos on the web have been 
> read in more than one case as DMR and people have said (more or less) "Wow 
> isn't the DMR great!"  (I had to smile in one case, it was taken with 
> Canon 20D and a Tokina lens).<<<

Hi Douglas,

That once again viewing a photograph and being so adamant how good it is for 
detail on the screen anyone of us can be led to believe what we "think we 
see."

ted
In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: DMR mk II ?)