Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Didier - If it was just parallax, the lens would have seen *more* of the lower part of the telescope than the finder (because it's lower). Another possibility, if the field of view isn't wider, is an axial misalignment. The finder pointed down with respect to the lens (the lens pointed up with respect to the finder) could also explain it. >Dick, I don't think the finder is much WIDER, but in this shot, he >was HIGHER. At that close distance parallax is an issue even with a >superwide angle lens. >Didier > > >>Dider - As you've probably just read in my earlier post, the finder >>field was wider than the image field so the bottom of the telescope >>got cut off. Am looking forward to seeing your Heliar shots, too. >> >>Thanks for the input. > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Regards, Dick Boston MA