Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: The DM-R has landed!
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Thu Feb 2 01:57:52 2006
References: <200602011903.k11IxLAR058004@server1.waverley.reid.org> <43E14ED1.9030005@telefonica.net>

Really like the detail, Felix.

Whose lenses were you using? They certainly make your 3200 point very  
clear.

B.

On 2-feb-2006, at 1:14, F?lix L?pez de Maturana wrote:

> >Hmm. One wonders if this work-around could be applied to other  
> digital cameras.
> >For instance, if a 5D is acceptable at ISO 3200, what are the  
> results when  underexposed two stops, ISO 12,800?
> >Somebody turn out the lights and give it a go, okay? I would, but  
> my gear is not at hand.
> >-Chris Lawson
>
> I never did that as I thought it wasn't necessary  but just have a  
> look at some pictures every of them shot at 3200 ISO in very low  
> light  situation.. The Portico de la Gloria in the cathedral of  
> Santiago de Compostela a middle age sculpture masterwork.. I see  
> myself using more often my 5D than my 1Ds MkII. and very, very  
> often at 3200 ISO were dynamic range is a little bit smaller than  
> at 100 ISO but just enough.
>
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=554115
>
> Regards
>
> Felix
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re: Re: The DM-R has landed!)
In reply to: Message from FELIXMATURANA at telefonica.net (Félix López de Maturana) ([Leica] Re: Re: The DM-R has landed!)