Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Martin, I think the comments from the LUG revolve around the fact that Leica should have made operational provision for 1600 and 3200 ISO ............... and that the quality of the chip seem to be sufficient to provide that. B. On 1-feb-2006, at 12:17, Martin Krieger wrote: > http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00F5p6 > > I just wanted to encourage all to see this series of posts that > Doug Herr provided the URL for. After hearing so many complaints > about why the DMR, how it will kill Leica, etc etc, here is someone > who says: if you know what you are doing you can get superior > performance, and as far as I can see he is not being paid by anyone > to say that. And that is the general Leica theme: if you know what > you are doing, you can get superior performance. > > My version of this is the following. I want to be able to see > detail at the edge of the frame (so that I can read something that > is posted on a wall, but which I never even thought to look at > closely when I was making the photograph). Will the Leica lens be > good there (and not only or mainly in the center parts)? Yes, if > you know what you are doing... (actually, even if you don't know > what you are doing!--for they are designed for a more balanced > performance over the frame, or so it seems). > Martin Krieger > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information