Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another, ahem, shot at hockey
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Sun Jan 29 17:04:33 2006
References: <4cfa589b0601281259q5b4230b2mfa9cf6c8e6868346@mail.gmail.com> <43DD6440.1060709@hemenway.com>

Laughing - that 2nd shot - that's CLOSE! But yes, I take your meaning.
I just have to learn the game better to use the longer lens because I
can't anticipate how the action is going to flow yet. The 2nd game was
totally different than the first one (better team being the reason).
All those patterns out there happening and I have to learn to see
them.

You'd think that it would be easier with a sport like water polo that
is to hockey as, say, my Element is to a Formula 1 car, but  it's not.
Because of the water it's even more complex and while you can see
faces clearly the flow of the game means everything. I might get brave
this spring and shoot some water polo - last year was a, well, washout
in terms of good shots.

Thanks to everyone who has shared their thoughts on these hockey
photographs. You have helped me learn, made great suggestions, and
continue to inspire me. Except for that last shot, Jim, I'm just not
sure about that one!

Adam

On 1/29/06, Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> wrote:
> Hi Adam:
>
> I think that it might help if you got in closer, perhaps a longer lens:
>
> http://www.starcase.com/images/hockey.jpg
>
> http://www.calmberg.de/serendipity/uploads/hockey.jpg  :-)
>
> Jim
>
> Adam Bridge wrote:
>
> > Since my last set was all artsy-fartsy I have a couple more gritty and
> > real hockey pix from last night's game. The champion Phoenix Polar
> > Bears vs the 2nd place Sacramento Thunder Junior B, tier 1 teams.
> >
> > Goal!!!:
> >
> > <http://www.adambridge.com/Photos/2006/01/27/_L3U8843.jpg>
> >
> > Centering shot:
> >
> > <http://www.adambridge.com/Photos/2006/01/27/_L3U8851.jpg>
> >
> > Techie stuff - the first was with the 100 APO, 2nd with the Canon 24-70L.
> >
> > Both images shot at 3200.
> >
> > The reports about how the camera's metering system adjusts for the
> > lens seems right on. I was setting my exposure compensation up 2 stops
> > for the Leica 100 APO but for the Canon the same metering, same
> > subject rquired 1 stop compensation. Go figure. Fun with electronics.
> >
> > Comments etc are most welcome
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Another, ahem, shot at hockey)
In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Another, ahem, shot at hockey)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Another, ahem, shot at hockey)