Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No, actually, I haven't worked with *any* film scanners. I'm drawing my conclusions from various photo lists. It seems like the vast majority of scanned negatives that aren't done at the lab happen with either a Nikon scanner or a Konica/Minolta scanner. Keep in mind that these are very rough estimates on my part with no scientific basis. Anyway, I'd love to hear pros or cons but I bet I can find those on the archives. Frank Farmer Jackson, Miss. On Jan 25, 2006, at 9:27 AM, bruce wrote: > See the rest of my mail ................ have you worked with/tested > all the others? Or are you only looking for a 35mm scanner > .............. if I remember, it was that? > > B. > > > On 25-jan-2006, at 16:00, Frank F. Farmer wrote: > >> This IS bad news. The Nikon equivalent scanner is almost twice as >> much as the KM DiMAGE. I suppose that Nikon will not really have any >> competition in the film scanner business now. >> >> Frank Farmer >> Jackson, Miss. >> >> On Jan 25, 2006, at 4:52 AM, bruce wrote: >> >>> There is a sizable quantity of scanners of various models on >>> back-order (BeNeLux), some for several months now ............... >>> and although there is no mention of scanners in the various KM >>> statements, he anticipated the supply to be finished/dead. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >