Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm talking about the bulk slide feeder. I heard Nikon improved it in this last iteration. The feeder for the LS-4000 was prone to jams and misfeeds. There is nothing to do except tend it once in a while, correct things that go wrong. I would say that 2-3 slides out of ten on average will jam. It's that bad. On Jan 18, 2006, at 10:05 AM, Adam Bridge wrote: > I use the roll-film adaptor on the LS-4000 and it works quite well. > What has your experience been with it to use such terms? I believe the > adaptors are identical between the two cameras. > > Adam Bridge > > On 1/18/06, Jim Laurel <jplaurel@spectare.com> wrote: >> Really? I had no idea they were dying out so fast. I guess it's >> time to get my last one - an LS-5000. Is the bulk feeder any better >> than the one for the LS-4000? That one is real garbage. >> >> On Jan 18, 2006, at 12:18 AM, Daniel Ridings wrote: >>> >>> The film scanners are definitely a dying breed. They are going >>> faster >>> than film manufacturers and film cameras. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information