Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon Jan 16 23:56:29 2006
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20060114232020.0ab9def8@192.168.100.42>
 
To tell the truth, I spend my days looking at women ... for various reasons.

At the moment there seems to be a fashion in women's bags that could
easily be ignored and used as camera bags instead. Side pockets,
internal divisions, canvas. Cheap.

That's what I tell my wife, anyway, when she disapproves of my interest.

Daniel

On 1/15/06, Richard <richard-lists@imagecraft.com> wrote:
> I am thinking about ordering a M Classics bag. Seems like what I need - no
> bulky profile, easy to access, holds couple bodies. I won't be using it for
> general camera transportation, only when I am shooting so the lack of
> padding shouldn't matter. Any negative experience that I should know about?
>
> Thanks.
>
> // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
> use richard at imagecraft.com)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)
 In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] any reasons NOT to get a M Classic bag...)