Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, his sweatshirt looks really good <g>. I'm fiddling with a few other pictures from that lot. Actually, an outdoor shot under better conditions looks very much like Tri-X and D-76. I'll shoot you a few pictures offlist when I done messing with them. Thanks for the feedback! Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of David Rodgers Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:33 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] Tri-X and D-23 Jeffery, I really like this picture. If the light was horrific, you certainly tamed it well. The tonality is very nice. If I have to choose one over the other, I'll take tonality over acutance in portraiture. Yet everything in this shot that's in focus looks plenty sharp to me. DaveR -----Original Message----- From: Jeffery Smith [mailto:jsmith342@cox.net] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 8:49 AM To: 'Leica Users Group' Subject: RE: [Leica] Tri-X and D-23 Yes, that is pretty much what I got. I wasn't expecting to get such little grain that it couldn't really even be called "grain". I'm thinking that it might be a good people film/dev combination, but a terrible landscape combination. There doesn't seem to be a lot of sharpness anywhere (but I was shooting wide open indoors under horrific lighting conditions with no ambient light and a big window to our right side). http://www.400tx.com/george.html I'm ambivalent on it. The sheer simplicity of D-23 (two powders) makes me want to explore it a bit more, at least under some different conditions. Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information