Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Peter. That is why I "hated to say it". But you are right, though I feel that the textures and the walls were sufficient to convey that it was a big place. peace David On Jan 15, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Peter Klein wrote: > David: I must disagree with you here. Without the people, we have > absolutely no idea how big the object is, or what it is. They are > very necessary. The very thing that makes it an effective "cold, > futuristic picture" is that we see the geometry, then we see the > people and do a double take as our minds grasp the scale. > > --Peter > > At 08:51 AM 1/15/2006 -0800, David Cochran <cochranpr@mac.com> wrote: >> Hi Don. You just took me on a trip back to the 70's! >> >> I hate to say this but it is a pity there were people in the shot. It >> is one of those futuristic, cold pictures that makes you believe in >> architecture as a life-changing endeavor by humans. >> Not that I believe any of it, used to back then when young and not >> aware of the world around me. >> >> peace >> >> david >> On Jan 15, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Don Dory wrote: >> >> > The Inforum in Atlanta has been one of the places I could never get >> an >> > image >> > that satisfied me. Well, with the construction of the new Aquarium >> it >> > seems >> > they put up a parking lot which finally provided a vantage point >> that >> > gave >> > me this view: >> > >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album337/inforumstairs >> > >> > Comments and brickbats cheerfully accepted. >> > >> > Don >> > don.dory@gmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information