Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] MP review
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat Jan 14 11:43:48 2006

When he says that his 50/1.8 lens, is he not talking about the 1.4 Summilux?

This makes me NOT want to go out and buy a cheap scanner. Why have that sort
of resolution only to waste it with a cheap scanner?

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Borden
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 1:23 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] MP review


http://www.photo.net/equipment/leica/mp/

The comparison pics of Leica, Hasse, Canon, Sony are an excellent  
demonstration. It exactly mirrors my own experience (e.g.. the JPEG  
artifact from the Sony).

Jonathan

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from jonathan at openhealth.org (Jonathan Borden) ([Leica] MP review)