Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]................ and then us all know what you find! ........................ please. B. On 11-jan-2006, at 23:14, mcyclwritr@comcast.net wrote: > Phil, > > I have no experience with the D50, but I do have some familiarity > with shooting digital at higher ISOs. Unless you or your daughter > have an investment in another manufacturer's interchangeable SLR > lenses, Canon is seems to be the consensus choice of reviewers for > higher-ISO digital shooting. Why? The Canon high-ISO mojo is mo' > better to begin with. > > Plus, you can make it even better. Though I don't know if it's the > case with the Rebel XT, the 20D or the 5D, possibly both, have a > user-selectable Custom Function that, in effect, lets the > photographer say, "Yes, most exhalted digital wizard camera body, > you please employ a little extra processing time and make image as > noiseless as possible. Humbly, I wait." > > Or something like that. > > Anyway, why not go to a Canon-Nikon camera store and do a high-ISO > A-B test? Even throw Minolta and Pentax into the mix and make it an > A-B-C-D test. Then, take the card home and evaluate the images > until your eyes go wonky. > > -Chris Lawson > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: pswango@att.net >> My daughter is shopping for a first-time DSLR in the low-end of >> the price range. >> Her previous experience is with film cameras -- she has a BA in >> Photography. >> The Nikon D-50 seems attractive for the price. Does anyone here >> have experience >> with it. I'm especially interested in performance at ISO 800-1600 >> (specifically, noise levels). > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information