Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Oct 30, 2005, at 6:14 AM, SonC@aol.com wrote: > > > In a message dated 10/30/2005 5:30:52 A.M. Central Standard Time, > kididdoc@cox.net writes: > > _http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html_ > (http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html) > > if Sonny wants to show in Friday flowers, a flower on a coffee mug, > or a jet fighter.... I will look and not complain... > > > Of course, and I have even shown them in a flower bed. > _http://www.sonc.com/flower_bed.htm_ (http://www.sonc.com/ > flower_bed.htm) love it Sonny... > > > But the context in a set need not be explained. Had there been > one more > shot of someone ignoring the camera, that might have change > everything in my > mind. The context of the set was several people looking right at > the lens and > one not. I'm not complaining, I just think the set would be > stronger without > him. Not only the eyes, bot the entire composition of 85 seems at > odds with > the others. More than mere dissonance. I understand of course... most important, thanks for your comments, Steve > > > Regards, > Sonny > http://www.sonc.com > Natchitoches, Louisiana > Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane > ?galit?, libert?, crawfish > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >