Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 50mm R Summicron vs de Lux
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat Oct 8 07:08:10 2005
References: <82c9dd70510080616q2178c864qfa4c8b071bd5561d@mail.gmail.com>
 
Right now the 'lux-R isn't that much higher cost wise. On the other  
hand, even poor performance at f1.4 is better than no performance  
from not having f1.4 on hand.


Slobodan Dimitrov
Studio G-8, AGCC
http://sdimitrovphoto.com



On Oct 8, 2005, at 6:16 AM, Eric Korenman wrote:

> of those who have shot with both the 50mm R 'cron and 'lux, which  
> do you
> prefer?
> Does the 'lux really match/outperform the 'cron at f2 and greater  
> as Erwin
> reports?
>  is the de-Lux really that de-lovely?
> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] 50mm R Summicron vs de Lux)