Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Robert, The real question is how does it look compared to other DSLR's. Compared to all but the Canon's, mighty fine. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 10/3/05, Robert Stevens <leica@robsteve.com> wrote: > > After seeing how well the high ISO images from the DMR convert to > B&W, I though I would try underexposing the DMR by 1 stop when set at > 1600 ISO. I did this by using exp comp -1 and shot on Auto. I then > opened the DNG raw and allowed the Adobe Camera to correct for the > under exposure. To get B&W, I just set saturation on the DNG > conversion to -100. > > Here is the shot of a neighborhood cat. It was at dusk and I was > using the 100mm APO at f3.4 and 180th of a second. > > http://www.robsteve.com/DMR/L1040017.jpg > > Here is a crop, unsharpened into the eye area. > > http://www.robsteve.com/DMR/L1040017CRP.jpg > > For members with high speed, here is a jpeg of the full DMR fill > saved as a 9 quality jpeg. > > http://www.robsteve.com/DMR/L1040017LRG.jpg > > Hows does it look compared to 3200 iso film scans? > > Regards, > > Robert > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/117 - Release Date: 10/3/2005 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >