Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ken, You might do a search in the archives. My quick one revealed this: http://leica-users.org/v28/msg1488328.html Basically, the pre-asph is known for wonderful bokeh and the asph is less known that. Some don't like it because of what they term "harsh" bokeh, whatever that is. When looking at the in-focus image, the asph is the winner I think. Great lens in all respects in my opinion. For a long time, it was my only lens. Good luck with your decision. Frank Farmer Jackson, Miss. On Sep 5, 2005, at 9:30 PM, Kenneth Frazier wrote: > Okay, LUGers, I need some advice. > > I'm getting ready to spring for a Summicron-M 35 lens, which I do not > have, and want to know the relative merits/demerits of a comparison > between the Summicron-M 1:2/35 and the Summicron-M 1:2/35 ASPH. > > Budget considerations aside, for the moment, if I could buy either one, > which is my better choice? > > Reading all the tech stuff doesn't mean a lot to me, so I would like > the > input of folks who've used the lenses. > > TIA, > > Ken > -- > The Rev. Kenneth Frazier > Norfield Congregational Church > CT Conference, United Church of Christ > Weston, CT USA > Leica photos at: http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >