Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/08/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] leica branded lenses
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sun Aug 28 11:21:44 2005
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNGEBDCKAB.red735i@earthlink.net> <002401c5abf2$83cc3240$1ae76c18@ted> <6.2.3.4.2.20050828135321.01ea4820@mail.rhtc.net> <46FE458A-D2BA-457A-8035-46013F9F8B8C@earthlink.net>
At 02:12 PM 8/28/2005, you wrote:
>Tina, have you shot the Canon 1.4/35, 2/35 or 1.4/50?
>
>Feli
Feli -
I have the 50/1.4. It's not a bad lens, but not in the same class
with the 24/1.4 and the 85/1.2. Those two are L lenses and are much
heavier and have aspherical and UD lens elements and what they
describe as a "circular diaphragm for better background blur" -
whatever it is it works. I don't have a Canon 35., but the 24 is
actually a 31 with the 1.3 multiplier.
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] leica branded lenses)