Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol
From: mail at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Sun Aug 14 02:59:52 2005
 
It varies from film to film.

Tri-X in Xtol 1:3 looks excellent with only 75ml of developer in my
Patterson tank. Tmax 100 on the other hand is a disaster at this
dilution/amount of developer giving negatives so thin you wonder who's
stolen the photograph. FP4 and HP5 are also ok with 75ml.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of Richard
Sent: 14 August 2005 03:19
To: Leica Users Group; Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol


Hmmm... "everyone" swears up and down that you need at least 100-125 ml.
of 
Xtol per roll... Is Mark someone special with super power :-)?

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.8/71 - Release Date:
12/08/2005
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)