Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Thu Aug 11 09:12:26 2005
References: <1f4.f8f33d7.302cb18c@aol.com><021101c59e80$8609aa30$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <FCC14580-FE25-4C8B-B8F6-A70F1F59EE76@earthlink.net>

Yes, you're right.   They say this on a later page:
"Using Adobe Camera RAW 2.4 to convert RAW images from both cameras the 
differences between the two are much less, you would be very hard pushed to 
find any more detail in the EOS 300D image (which we couldn't attribute to 
its slightly higher vertical pixel count). Further evidence if any where 
needed that the *ist DS can produce great images, but only if you shoot RAW. 
"

>
> Don't they say that the Pentax jpgs out of the camera are a touch  soft, 
> but when
> generated from the a RAW file are very sharp?
>
>
> feli
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
> feli2@earthlink.net                 2 + 2 = 4 
> www.elanphotos.com
>
>
> NO ARCHIVE
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR)
In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Re:Canon Anything vs. DMR)