Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Dennis and Ted - and Ted, you are definitely right about the overburning; back to the computer screen on that one. ;-) On 8/7/05 3:03 PM, "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote: > B. D. Colen showed: > Subject: [Leica] B. D. PAW >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/B-D-COLEN-PAW/RainatHarvard >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/B-D-COLEN-PAW/Sophie1 >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/B-D-COLEN-PAW/Kris2<<<<<<<< > > Hi B.D., > The Harvard shot is my first choice. I'm a sucker for rain drops on windows > with interesting backgrounds just barely distinguishable in the background. > > I noticed someone made a comment about the background building being too > centred, I think it's to each his own. But I feel this kind of shot due to > composition needs the building centre because the rain drops are the main > element and they make it all come together. > > The other two? Mother and child #2: > > A nice example of "LIGHT-EYES-RE-ACTION" ;-) and shooting from the shadow > side as subtle as it is, but it makes the picture work along with the other > two elements for successful pictures. > > Portrait is #3.. The extra burning was a little over done. However, heck > we've all done that on more than one occasion so it's no big deal. ;-) > > ted > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information