Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!
From: nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat Jul 23 21:58:16 2005
References: <200507231448.j6NEmj3P088690@server1.waverley.reid.org> <022d01c58fb0$acfd1390$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs>

Bob,

Looking at Maco's site (www.mahn.net), Freestyle is listed as the 
distributor for the US, and indeed they appear to have it stock:
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/sc_search.php?rfnp=40&q=maco&mfg=75&rfnc=405&;

Nathan

Robert Meier wrote:

> Norm-
> 
> B&H doesn't list Maco film.  Where do you get it?
> 
> Bob
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norm Aubin" <puff11@comcast.net>
> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 9:48 AM
> Subject: RE: [Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!
> 
> 
>> Nathan, Alastair,
>>
>> I have to second that thought about Maco 820 - I use it in sheet and 
>> in 35mm
>> roll,
>> Rated at ISO 200, using an approximately 6 stop filter, a Kodak 
>> Wratten 87,
>> and processed in Perceptol 1:2 (my then developer of choice).
>>
>> Because of the anti-halation layer, and the smother grain from the film
>> (versus Kodak), I felt it was much better at giving a beautiful IR 
>> effect,
>> but in a smooth tones and sharper image.  Not as dreamy as Kodak, but 
>> much
>> more interesting to look at for any length of time.
>>
>> I do prefer working with this stuff in a rangefinder camera, and will 
>> also
>> add that the Canonette works good for this when you don't want to commit
>> your M6 to being loaded with IR film for the duration of a 36 exp. Roll.
>>
>>
>> Enjoy and please let us see what you do with it!
>>
>> Norm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@planet.nl>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>
>> Alastair,
>>
>> Maco is the best, my favourite IR film. In contrast to Kodak's High
>> Speed IR, it *can* be loaded and unloaded in subdued light. It is less
>> extreme than Kodak but much stronger than Konica's or Ilford's offerings
>> (I am assuming you have the 820 flavour of the Maco, since they also
>> have a weaker, 750 version).
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>> Alastair Firkin wrote:
>>
>>> I think you beat me to it: I just bought some maco IR to try ;-)
>>>
>>> Nice shots and good use of the film
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com



In reply to: Message from puff11 at comcast.net (Norm Aubin) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] InfraRed photos... WARNING, OMG, not Leica!)