Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Planar 50/2 vs. latest Summicron 50/2
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Tue Jul 19 11:52:40 2005
References: <42DD4492.6060802@adrenaline.com>

i have both and thay are about the same price with leica just a little
more, go for the leica

On 7/19/05, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> Which to buy? What are the relevant relative strengths and weaknesses
> of each. For B&W? For color?  Bokeh?
> 
> Anyone done a head to head comparison? Or just subjective opinions?
> 
> Pricewise (a factor for me), a used current and minty Summicron 50/2 with
> it's built in shade (eyes on a chrome one) should probably cost me a
> little less
> than a new Planar 50/2 with it's somewhat expensive bayonet shade.
> 
> But cost aside....
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Zeiss Planar 50/2 vs. latest Summicron 50/2)
In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Zeiss Planar 50/2 vs. latest Summicron 50/2)