Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] My PAW of week 27
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Thu Jul 14 08:10:31 2005
References: <BEFB6949.3FF5%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

Nice pic!

Philippe Orlent wrote:

>Hi Didier,
>
>I suspect it's Jalbum that's causing it: it seems to enlarge any grain or
>noise, too. So I put it on without this annoying pixelisation:
>
>http://users.telenet.be/philippe.orlent/F1000020.jpg
>
>---
>
>  
>
>>From: Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com>
>>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:21:59 +0200
>>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] My PAW of week 27
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Unfortunately, a lot of detail and tone is lost because of the downsizing.
>>>      
>>>
>>Philippe
>>http://users.telenet.be/philippe.orlent/PAW2005/slides/Wk27.jpg
>>Seems to be a downsizing problem. The picture looks very pixely to me. The
>>black front shock absorber (of the bike in the middle) for instance, looks
>>like a "pixel stairway". How did you downsize it? Is it the gallery tool
>>that does it - because many of them make very cheap downsizing without
>>bicubic recalculating. A Photoshop downsize with decent unsharp masking
>>looks different, IMO. Just my 2 pesos...
>>Didier
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>  
>



In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] My PAW of week 27)