Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Don,
I never tried the 21/3,4, I've always read this is a very great lens, for
colectionists too.
Thanks for your opinion
Saludos desde Barcelona
Luis
-----Mensaje original-----
De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de
Don Dory
Enviado el: domingo, 10 de julio de 2005 4:16
Para: Leica Users Group
Asunto: Re: [Leica] Opinions about diffeent Leica 21mm
Luis,
I have the 21 F3.4 SA for the M and the 21 SA F4 for the R. The M
version does have more vignetting but is sharper, no traditional
distortion and a more even transition at the edges. As I shoot in B&W
most of the time, I don't really have an appreciation for color
differences.
>From tests of the 19 and the 21 ASPH the newest glass will have more
distortion but have much less loss of sharpness into the corners at
the expense of smoothness that the less sharp predecessors had.
Don
don.dory@gmail.com
On 7/9/05, Luis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Some time ago I've sold my Super-Angulon R 4/21mm ("Wetzlar"), and bought
> the Elmarit-M 2,8/21mm, in my opinion I appreciate these differences:
>
> The 21R rendered more warm tones than the M, I find this more cool.
> Deformation of the perspective was more noticeable on the 21R, than on the
> 21M.
> Some tendence to vigneting is more appreciate on the M than on the R.
>
> Any opinions or experiences?
>
> Saludos desde Barcelona
> Luis
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information