Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sat Jul 2 12:50:51 2005

Sorry, but 28 Mb in quadri for an A4 image (about magazine size).
I understand why stock agencies ask for 50 Mb: A3 is about the biggest size
needed. Bigger fomats are very often used at lower lpi.


> From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:12:33 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon
> 
> At 10:31 PM 7/1/2005, you wrote:
>> I know nothing about stock so I hate to be looking like I'm going against
>> Tina who is of course involved with it intensely;
>> Mark Rabiner
> 
> Not against me, Mark, but against the agencies.  I totally believe that
> smaller digital files and scans will work perfectly even for billboard
> sized prints.  That's just a matter of viewing distance.  8MB is more than
> enough for magazines.  But tell that to the agencies.  Most of them accept
> only 50MB files and up.
> 
> Tina
> 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon)
In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re:where oh where is the DMR now Canon)