Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Very nice indeed Luis, I always scan at 4000dpi (Coolscan V ED) get everything you can out of a slide or negative,I have also found that a scan will hardly ever be as bright and lucid as a slide, but you can get very close - as we can see in your picture. You can always reduce the file size some time later on while processing, Make a copy of the original file then perform the basic corrections you need on the full 64MB copy and store the result as a TIFF (no compression) and use this as a basis for your prints or for posting. The higher resolution the better during processing, any processes will of course take longer but will have a better statistical base to work on. i.e. more real information = less interpolation = better result cheers Douglas Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi all, > > After a lot of patiente I've obtained the showed results, not so good as > the > original slide where the coulours are more luminous and "transparent", but > I > think quite aceptable. But if every picture to be scanned takes so > longtime..., I'll probably continue posting B&W. > > I scan at 3200 dpi, obtaining a image of 64 MB, maybe is too much..., your > opinions will be welcome and I'll learn from your experience, this is the > pic: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3457634 > > Thanks for looking > Saludos desde Barcelona > Luis > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >