Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In many lens reviews i read that different lenses produce different sized grain lumps more modern lenses producing smaller lumps when looked at under a microscope.best,simon jessurun,amsterdam > > On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:45 AM, Ric Carter wrote: > >> Okay, feli, I'll call you crazy. > > Well, you're not the first to do so. > ;-) > >> Grain is a physical object -- a little tiny rock of metallic silver. It's >> shape and size are determined by the size of the rocks pasted on the >> film, the amount of light that hits the rock, and the way it is >> developed. >> How on earth could the lens that only dumps light on the rock possibly >> affect that? >> Large, low contrast areas do make grain easier to see and more apparent. >> Lots of image detail makes it less so. So in theory, I guess a soft, low >> contrast lens may make you notice grain more, and a contrasty lens may >> make you notice it less, but that's simply your reaction to the picture. >> The actual grain of the film is the same, a characteristic of the film >> and developer only. >> > > I'm really not sure what the answer is. There shouldn't be a difference, > since like you > said, grain really is a crystal of a fixed size etc. I really don't have > an answer, but believe > I am seeing a pattern in my negatives. I'll try to do a test some time, by > exposing several > lenses on the same strip of film. > > feli > > >> Ric Carter >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies > ________________________________________________________ > feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com > > > no archive > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information