Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Another interesting option is the recent Rollei 40/2.8. Some positive reviews on RangeFinderForum and elsewhere, IIRC. Finally available (new) at a reasonable price. Check B&H. BTW - these are public service announcements. I'm pretty happy with my 28 + 50mm FL lens kit. Scott Mark Langer wrote: >It isn't a strong favorite, but I'm interested in it as a possiblity. >I am very happy with the performance of the CV 28/3.5 and am curious >as to whether anyone on this list has had a positive experience with >the 40/1.4 as I consider my options for a 40mm lens for the CLE. It >is as simple as that. I want to know what the image quality is like, >how it balances on the CL or CLE body, etc. Not having one locally to >try out, this is the best I can do to see if this is worth getting, as >opposed to sticking with my Canon 35/2 or getting the Leitz or Minolta >50/2. > >Mark > >On 6/7/05, John O. Newell <john.o.newell@comcast.net> wrote: > > >>>it's about my >>>favorite lens. I use it all the time. More than my 50 and more than my 35. >>> >>> >>Mark, why? >> >>Size? >>Image quality? >>Other? >> >>Interested in why it's become such a strong favorite for you. No rocket >>science reasons required. ;-) >> >>John Newell >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >